Calling it “the biggest delegulatory action”, the environmental protection agency on Wednesday took steps, which aims to refund environmental security and end the hosting of climate change rules, in a few decades.
Together, agency’s functions indicate regeneration of the agency away from renewable energy, carbon deduction programs and government support from the government support of renewable energy, carbon deduction programs and the government support of the regulations of most climate regulations.
EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin rolled out more than two dozen policy announcements through a series of press releases and public statements. The list of proposed changes includes the promise to refund emissions on coal, oil and gas production and work in federal agencies, which determines that greenhouse gas emissions, such as carbon dioxide and methane, are not only heating the planet, but also a threat to public health.

EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin speaks in East Palestine, Ohio, 3 February, 2025.
Rebecca Drake, Reuters via Pool, File
A statement on the EPA website states, “We are running a dagger directly in the heart of climate change religion to reduce the cost of living for American families, highlight American energy, bring auto jobs back to the US and more,” Zeldin has written in a statement on the EPA website.
Backlash was sharp from the environment community.
“If they find their way, they will burn our air, our water, our homes, and ruin the future generations a non-cultivation. Response.
“Corporate pollutants are celebrating today because the EPA of Trump handed them a free pass to extinguish only unlimited climate pollution, the results can be damaged. The biden administration first put carbon boundaries on dirty coal and gas plants, which are cutting into the air pollution to avoid the damage to the climate, and to avoid the damage to the climate. “Climate Vanual Action Senior Power Sector Policy Lead Charles Harper wrote in a statement.

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) headquarters Washington, DC is shown on February 18, 2025.
Boney Cash via Shutterstock/UPI
Changes in the rules and regulations declared on Wednesday will still have to undergo a federal regulatory process and possibly stand for many courts from environmental groups. However, today’s actions make good on the President’s campaign, which promises to reduce many long -established rules and regulations made early to protect our water, air, soil and human health.
Danger discovery
One of the most important announcements was that the EPA would engage in the “formal reconsideration” of the exploration of the danger of the agency.
In 2009, EPA released a “danger detection”, which determined that greenhouse gases including carbon dioxide, methane and others pose a threat to public health and environment. Inspired by the 2007 Supreme Court verdict in Massachusetts vs. EPA, this decision gave the EPA legal rights to regulate these emissions under the Clean Air Act (CAA).
The discovery represents legal underpining for several rules related to greenhouse gas emissions, including emission standard for vehicles, power plants and oil and gas production – all of which Zeldin said Zeldin said the agency would also re -evaluate to rethink it.
If the Trump administration decides that no longer applies to detecting the danger and this determination survives the challenges of the court, the value of the 16 -year emission rules, including the President Biden, can be put in danger.
Vehicle emission standards
Zeldin also targeted the biden-era vehicle standards, stating that the EPA would abolish the tail orpi emission rules announced by the previous administration last year.
While the Trump administration repeatedly referred to these standards as an EV “mandate”, there was no such mandate by the Biden administration.
The Biden Environmental Protection Agency implemented the tailPype emission standards last March, which established average emissions in the entire fleet of the proposed vehicles of the vehicle manufacturer. The standards would have only affected cars from 2027 to 2032 and allowed for a variety of usable technologies including fully electric cars, hybrids and better internal combustion engines. These standard are applied to light and medium-fees vehicles. A separate set of standards for heavy duty vehicles was released.
As the EPA of Zeldin announced a reconsideration of these standards, it said, stating, “The regulator and compliance cost $ 700 billion,” alleged, alleging, alleging, alleging, “Americans’ ability to choose a safe and cheap car for their family and the cost of living on all the products that distribute the trucks.”
Effect on coal
One of the policies being reconsidered is “Clean Power Plan 2.0”, which targets emissions from coal and natural gas power plants.

On this 4 May 2021, the file photo, inside the Texas City Industrial Complex, the refineries inside the Texas City Industrial Complex with the Texas City, Fish, Texas City, Texas City in Texas, including marathon and Valleo in Texas City in Texas.
Mark Muligan/Houston Chronicle Getty Image, through File
At that time, the agency claimed that the new rules would represent a huge decrease in pollution and save hundreds of billions of dollars in climate and public health costs as it would force power plants to control 90% of their carbon pollution through carbon captures and will tighter the emissions of emissions for the toxic metals issued from coal.
In one of the several press releases sent on Wednesday, the EPA tried to stop the rules “overrouuding” and “the United States attempted to discontinue cheap and reliable power generation, raised prices for American families, and increased the country’s dependence on foreign forms of energy.”
Social cost of carbon
Even in the 31 works announced by the agency, there is one again of the “social cost of carbon”, Zeldin said that the previous administration used the metric to “pursue its climate agenda in a way that had spent major costs.”
In 2010, the EPA released its first estimate under the then President Barack Obama that it is called “social cost of carbon” or SC-CO2. This metric was to catch the long -term damage made by carbon dioxide emissions every year in the dollar.
It has been estimated, in fact, the cost of damage related to climate change, including changes in agricultural productivity, human health, property loss from additional flood risk, energy cost changes and other ideas.
The Biden administration later updated the estimate process to include the idea of additional factors, increasing the National SC-CO2. In December 2023, Biden EPA updated the metric dramatically at a higher rate – $ 190 per tonne, compared to the first $ 51 per tonne of administration.
“To bring the great American return to power, we are committed to the removal of the rules of keeping the US completely back,” Zeldin said in the announcement.
I am a passionate digital marketer, content writer, and blogger. With years of experience in crafting compelling content and driving digital strategies. I’m always exploring new trends, optimizing strategies, and creating content that resonates with audiences. When I’m not working, you’ll find me diving into the latest digital marketing insights or experimenting with new blogging ideas.