Elon Musk or Amy Glison? – Propublica

When President Donald Trump announced his Marki Government Cost-Cotting Initiative, he left no doubt that he intended to run it: Elon Musk. Nevertheless, questions about Musk’s rights have since hounded the newly formed department of efficiency of the government.

As Dogi began to order a large -scale budget cuts and layoffs, and the people affected by the tricks started questioning the press and about their validity, in court, the administration officials told about the exact role of Musk, claiming that he was a senior advisor to the President and there was no official post in Dog.

Five weeks after its construction and under the pressure of rising waterfalls, the White House revealed in late February that a vague bureaucrat named Amy Glison had been working as a administrator of Dogi since almost a day.

However, Propublica has found that according to interviews by six current and former government officials, it does not appear to run the budget-consciousness group. Everyone spoke on the condition of anonymity for fear of losing their jobs.

“I understand that Amy is in the role of Bali’s goat,” a source said that Joe was in meetings with Glison.

The exact chain of command in Dogge is not clear for most federal employees who brush against the team. But sources told Propublica that for a long time Musk Lieutenant Steve Davis appears to administer day-to-day operations, a former executive of Musk’s boring company and SpaceX. And several times, Musk issued a command from the secretary of the war suite at the Executive Office Building of Eisenhwar next to the White House, said a person acquainted with the case.

“I don’t know who Amy Glison is also,” a person said that a federal agency has worked closely with Dogi’s leadership. “Davis runs the show.”

Musk, Davis and Glison did not respond to the recommendations of the comment.

Since Dogge was created by an executive order on 20 January, the Trump administration has gone to a big length to create a legal distance between Kasturi and the unit, saying that he is neither an employee nor its head. And even though this order makes the role of an administrator – someone to coordinate with the White House and help to keep DOGE teams inside the agencies – the Trump administration rejected questions about who was in that position for more than a month.

This system has confused the judges who oversee the challenges of Dogi. “The entire operation, the question raises the question,” US District Judge Theodore Chuang commented, stating that the lack of clarity was “highly suspicious”.

This setup can prove more difficult to prove that Musk has violated the struggles of laws of interest, which usually prevent federal employees from joining government affairs that affect their own business interests.

Richard Painter, a former top morality lawyer of the George W Bush administration, said, “It is denying that Kasturi is a legal dogi administrator,” this is more removed to him, and it could be difficult to prove a violation. ,

In an interview with Fox News, Musk dismisses concerns about conflicts, saying, “I will resume myself” if issues arise.

Negligence in declaration of Glison between Kasturi and Dogi’s daily tasks was negligent: Glison was on leave in Mexico when Trump’s Press Secretary, Karolin Levit nominated him as an acting administrator for a group of reporters in Washington. Glison told colleagues that the White House had not coordinated the announcement with him.

Other parts of the rollout were equally surprising: Levit claimed that Gleison was almost administrators since his inception – but colleagues said Glison started staff meetings for a month in administration with a small group of only one month career technologists, which were before the Trump administration.

Meanwhile, Glison told her former colleagues back to Nashville, Tennessee – where she recently worked as a health technology executive – she was planning to return there in a few months.

A government worker, who has been in meetings with Glison, describes him as “less to make any real decisions” responsibilities.

She revealed the same for colleagues in meetings in recent weeks, where she clarified that she was not deeply involved in the Dogi budget cutting that has put human programs in trouble and had outdated thousands of employees, the sources were in the meetings that used to tell the proposal.

One reason is difficult that who is in charge of Dogi: It includes two different teams that are almost completely closed to each other.

In making Dogi, Trump twisted the unit in the current American digital service, a small unit of technical experts kept inside the White House focused on improvement in government software platforms. While Dogi, on paper, there is a similar mission, the actual work of a group of Musk has been far more extended, such as cutting money in programs and getting access to the sensitive agency data system, as reported by Propublica and other media.

In recent weeks, many holdover digital service workers have resigned or discontinued, and some dozen remain a small group of federal technologists. Glison is only in charge of this small group, sources said.

Officers working with Glison, who served in digital service during former Trump and Biden administration, spoke to his dedication to the mission. One said that he helped upgrade health care technology in the government, such as digitizing the Covid-19 test results during epidemic.

A former colleague said, “My understanding about his early expectations was that USDS was going to keep pace with Dogi … while the government also did a better job.” “She was not expecting Dogi to come to the USDS and disintegrate.”

The confidentiality surrounding the appointment of Glison extends to all Dogi. The Trump administration has offered information about its employees – when forced by cases. In an attempt to gain a clear understanding of how the group operates, Propublica has spent weeks to identify and profile their employees.

These include engineers, lawyers, technology officers and advisors. Many people were admitted to Musk’s businesses, including SpaceX, Tesla, and Nurlinks, or firms owned by their professional colleagues. Today Propublica is adding 20 names to our running list, up to 66. No one has responded to the requests for comments.

Some are listed to oversee the cuts in many agencies who monitored industries where they worked earlier.

Dogi handed over the interior department to Tyler Hasen, an executive of an energy industry. Scott Langgamac and Michael Alexander Mirsky – two officers of real estate firms – have been seen in the Housing and Urban Development Department. And former Tesla lawyer Daniel Abrahamson has worked for Dogi in the Transport Department – an agency allegedly amid several investigations on Teslas’ safety. Tesla has defended the safety of his vehicles.

No Doge’s employee responded to requesting for comments. The internal department said that it does not comment on the personnel, saying that there were no “dog employees” in the agency, and the Transport Department did not respond to the request for the comment.

Three of the names of Propublica are adding to our tracker, there are Engineers of Spacex of Musk, who have been released morality exemption by the Trump administration lawyers, who can probably benefit one of the mask companies to work. SpaceX, including the Internet Satellite Service Starlink, and Verizon is reportedly competing for the control of the federal aviation administration contract of $ 2.4 billion according to the Washington Post.

SpaceX responded to that reporting in a post on X. “Recent media reports about SpaceX and FAA are false,” it is written. “There is no attempt or intention for the starlink to ‘take’ any existing contract.” The FAA did not respond to the remarks request.

Publicly, Musk has continued Dogi’s mission. “People voted for major government reforms,” ​​he said, “and these people are going to get.”